SupportedRevision 1,
“wevm/viem is open source on GitHub”
No public source link was given.github.com/wevm/viem
wevm/viem is a public repository on GitHub. That shows the code is published, not that it's what's deployed.
Finding
Supported. Independent receipts back the narrow claim. That's all the label says: nothing about safety, intent or anything beyond the claim.
Claim: “wevm/viem is open source on GitHub” → looking for a public repository at the address → a public repository.
What we could verify
- wevm/viem is a public repository. Default branch main was at commit 323c9fda96b8 (2026-10-19T05:43:09Z); a licence GitHub couldn't identify; latest release viem@2.57.7. Read from GitHub's API at 2026-10-20T15:45:46.053Z. R-001
What remains unproven
- That this code is what's deployed or running
- That the project works, or that the code is safe
- That stars, a README or recent commits mean the product exists
Evidence
Each receipt is a hashed copy of what a source answered, kept unchanged. A correction arrives as a new receipt in a new revision.
Level A, independently observed
GitHub repository wevm/viem
Public repository; default branch main at 323c9fda96b8, licence NOASSERTION.
- Source
- Robinhood Chain RPC, read-only
- Observed
- Payload hash
Can't show: A public repository shows code was published, not that it's deployed or running.